163
163 is the largest Heegner number, and makes e to the power of pi root 163 almost an integer.
- Odd
- Prime
Where 163 fits
Why 163 is special
That expression comes within a trillionth of a whole number, which looks like a coincidence and is not — it follows from 163 being the largest of the nine Heegner numbers. The usual name for it, Ramanujan's constant, is a misnomer: it dates from Martin Gardner's April Fools' column in Scientific American in 1975, which reported the value as exactly an integer. Ramanujan never claimed it.
163 is part of
Factors & digit properties
- Divisors (2)
- 1, 163
- Prime factorisation
- 163
- Digit sum
- 10
- Digital root
- 1
Representations
- Decimal
- 163
- Scientific notation
- 1.630 × 10^2
Roman numerals
C L X I I I
Binary
1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1
1 × 128 + 0 × 64 + 1 × 32 + 0 × 16 + 0 × 8 + 0 × 4 + 1 × 2 + 1 × 1 = 163
Octal
2 4 3
2 × 64 + 4 × 8 + 3 × 1 = 163
Hexadecimal
a 3
a × 16 + 3 × 1 = 163
Read as powers of two: 128 + 32 + 2 + 1 = 163.
In historical numeral systems
Egyptian
1 coil of rope, 6 hobbles, 3 strokes
1 × 100 + 6 × 10 + 3 × 1 = 163. The signs are simply repeated and added; where they sit on the line is a matter of layout, not value.
Babylonian
2 vertical wedges (sixties place), 4 corner wedges + 3 vertical wedges (units place)
2 × 60 + 43 = 163. Places are separated by a space on the tablet, with the higher place written first.
Greek (Ionic)
rho, then xi, then gamma, marked as a numeral
rho-xi-gamma + keraia
rho + xi + gamma written in descending order and added — the letters carry their values wherever they stand, so this is addition, not place value.
Hebrew numerals
qof, then samekh, then gimel
qof-samekh-gimel
qof (100) + samekh (60) + gimel (3) = 163, written in descending order.
Maya
1 bar + 3 dots (upper, twenties place) over 3 dots (lower, units place)
8 × 20 + 3 = 163. Places stack vertically with the smallest at the bottom, so the upper group is worth twenty times the lower.
Systems that simply cannot reach this value are left out. Where a script needs a font most readers do not have, the reading is given instead of the glyphs — see number systems for each system in full.
Other mathematical patterns
- Deficient number
- Lucky number (mathematical sieve)
Related numbers & connections
Two numbers associated with Ramanujan for near-coincidences that turn out to have structure — the taxicab number and the almost-integer from the largest Heegner number.
View 1729 →Other connections
- is associated with1729
why?
Strength 0.50, confidence "high".
History
In the April 1975 issue of Scientific American, Martin Gardner reported as fact that e raised to π√163 had been shown to be exactly an integer, attributing the discovery to Ramanujan. It was an April Fools' item — the expression differs from a whole number in the twelfth decimal place — and the joke worked precisely because the near-miss is real and startling. The name 'Ramanujan's constant' for the quantity dates from the hoax rather than from Ramanujan, who never claimed it.
DocumentedHistoryPeriod: April 1975
Mathematics
There are exactly nine Heegner numbers — 1, 2, 3, 7, 11, 19, 43, 67 and 163 — and 163 is the largest. Kurt Heegner, a radio engineer working outside the university system, published a proof of the completeness of the list in 1952; it was dismissed as flawed and largely ignored, and only after Stark and Baker independently settled the problem in the late 1960s was Heegner's argument re-examined and found essentially correct. He had died in 1965.
DocumentedMathematicsPeriod: 1952 proof, accepted from 1969e to the power of pi root 163 differs from a whole number by less than a trillionth. The near-miss follows from 163 being the largest Heegner number, a fact about class numbers proved in the 1950s — so the coincidence has an explanation rather than being one.
DocumentedMathematics
Common questions
What is Ramanujan's constant?
The name is a misnomer that stuck. e raised to π√163 comes within a trillionth of a whole number, which is genuinely surprising and follows from 163 being the largest Heegner number. Martin Gardner reported in Scientific American in April 1975 that it was exactly an integer and credited Ramanujan — an April Fools' item. Ramanujan never claimed it, and the name dates from the hoax.
Is 163 a prime number?
Yes, 163 is prime — it has exactly two positive divisors: 1 and itself.
What are the factors of 163?
The factors of 163 are 1, 163.
What is 163 in Roman numerals?
163 in Roman numerals is CLXIII.
About this page's data
Mathematical facts:computed directly from the number's value — nothing to source or verify externally.
Contextual records: 3 reviewer-confirmed records, sourced and reviewed before publication.
Last reviewed: 15 July 2026